Though in Breath of the Wild’s case, one might argue that this game design philosophy might make it hard to make a streamlined and smooth story. One of the advantages of the wide approach to Breath of the Wild and Super Mario Odyssey is that many different types of gamers (casual/experienced, young/old) can enjoy these two games in some form. If you compare a game like Twilight Princess or Skyward Sword to Breath of the Wild, you can see how different the path to the end credits is and how much more is required of the player to get through the main story. Super Mario 3D World uses the gameplay focus from the original 2D games like Super Mario Bros. Overall, I think that Nintendo’s philosophy with both games is to provide a clear and relatively simple path to the finish line, while filling both game’s with huge amounts of optional content for the players who want more. Both are very different but very similar as well. In Super Mario Odyssey, there area also an assortment of side activities and new content that only open up after the end credits sequence, which some players may never even get to. While Super Mario Odyssey has a more clearly delineated path to its final boss, the game has hundreds of optional Power Moons (aka Stars) and secret sub-areas. Additionally, the player can go directly to the final boss without completing the Divine Beasts or another activities.

For example, Breath of the Wild players technically only need to complete four out of the one hundred and twenty Shrines: the initial Shrines on the Great Plateau. One of the common designs ideas connecting Breath of the Wild and Super Mario Odyssey that much of the game’s content is optional to “beating the game” or seeing the end credits.

Is super mario odyssey open world